Nuclear Weapons
In the beginning The Atomic Bomb was constructed to end a war and
save lives. Since that time fear and power have risen because of the
threat of world destruction. Coming from Los Alamos, New Mexico a town
that makes nuclear weapons I have a different view than most. In Los
Alamos we always have protesters with big signs calling the scientist,
that work at The Los Alamos National Laboratory, killers. Now when I
drive by and see these signs I can not help but think of my father,
stepmother, and all my neighbors, all of my friends’ parents as being
killers. I know and love these people and to see them called killers is
a strange concept to grasp. The following will discuss nuclear weapons
and what the intended use is, where and how nuclear weapons became a
problem, the effect it has had on the world, the problems it has
caused, what is being done about the problems. Nuclear weapons are the
backbone and liberator of our great country. To put a tool used to
insure our great country on the backburner would be a great injustice
and would put our country in grave danger.
Many people ask why do we still need all of these weapons or
killers as they are often referred to as? They think that we have
enough already and what is the point of continuing the excess. Instead
of thinking of nuclear weapons as killers we should be looking at them
as lifesavers. In that light I think everyone would agree that you
could not put a limit of the value of life. Everybody hears the
statistics about the United States having enough weapons to blow the
world up three times. This may be true, however as technology advances
so do weapons and you can bet other countries
are not settling for the weapons they already posses. If we were to
stop the production of nuclear weapons we would be alone in that
effort. When we have people like Sadam Hussain in the world, which we
always will, we need the protection that only nuclear weapons can
provide. If people think that trying to bargain with a man like Hussain
without safety net is plausible then they are hugely mistaken. It would
be like using a typewriter instead of using a computer because we have
an abundance of typewriters. “It would be wrong to assume that a
broader conception of international security makes it easier to achieve
the goal of nuclear abolition” (Cowen-Karp 6). People against nuclear
weapons feel that the United States of America should dispose of all
their nuclear weapons. If the United States of America disposed of all
its lifesavers we would have no power left to be the strongest nation
in the world. Many opponents believe this would be fine. If those
opponents were able to realize this would only jeopardize our freedom
they would reconsider. Yet many people still feel that there should be
peace and not war. The point these people are missing is that without
nuclear weapons we would be forced into a war without a way to defend
ourselves. The very right that people have to protest nuclear weapons
would be gone if the country, that gave them that right, had no means
to protect our freedoms. The only way it would be safe to discard all
nuclear weapons is if all countries everywhere did the same. Or just
roll over and let the other countries that continue on with the
production of providing its citizens with the best security. That is a
nice thought but how likely is it that every country will agree to just
dispose of nuclear weapons which cost billions if not trillions of
dollars over the years? Lets just say that every country decides to
dispose of the weapons, as well as all the money spent. How long will
it be before an egomaniac sees a fast path to world domination? Maybe
we should have never gone down the road of nuclear weapons, but now
that we live in this world we have no choice but to continue with the
process of keeping humanity from tyrants who want world domination.
Instead of thinking of all governments spending too much money of
nuclear weapons we should be thinking of it as our government spending
money to buy us a really good security system. “The fact that with all
nuclear powers the nuclear component consumes only a minor fraction of
total financial and manpower resources devoted to national defense”
(Wieda 2). If I was a robber I would go to the house without the
security system just like if I am a dictator looking to take over the
world I am going to take over the country who has no chance of fighting
me off. A lot of people believe that all of the National Laboratories
that work with nuclear weapons should be shut down. A very valid
thought to most, but these people do not realize the extent of the
laboratories role in our present society. None of these people realize
that the laboratories had many other departments within the laboratory.
They develop materials that help build the space shuttles, they make
chips that make our computers work faster, they develop different types
of machinery that helps save lives in emergency rooms and work closely
with the national weather service letting them know ahead of time when
a natural disaster might occur saving thousands of lives. All of these
life insurance policies are made and yet the only thing the newspaper
splashes around is spies selling secrets and people getting cancer
along with every other disease known to man from the supposed radiation
that all people in Los Alamos suffer from. There have been many claims
about the work done with nuclear weapons that has put Los Alamos
residents in danger. However, there has never been a case that has
proven the laboratory responsible for any claim.
Fifty years ago during World War II, a little town in northern New Mexico
was established to build the first atomic bomb. Los Alamos was a secret
city with the only residents being the top scientists in the world.
These scientists included Albert Einstein, Henry Openheimer, and Thomas
Mckibben, a man who lived across the street from me for almost my
entire life. I remember being young and Mr. Mckibben would tell my
sister and I epic stories about the first time the scientist tested the
first bomb. None of them knew if it would work or not, but had the hope
of helping to save many lives throughout the world. Mr. Mckibben was
given the duty to push the button to start the thirty-second countdown
that changed the war as well as the world forever. When it was all over
and the test was successful the scientists were elated with the fact
that they had a part in saving many lives. Later on in Mr. Mckibben’s
life he was hurt when people said that the making of the bomb was a
horrific and murderous thing. They were there to do a job for their
country, as well as humanity, which enabled the war come to an end.
However, in the end people brutalized them for creating world hysteria.
By creating the atomic bomb and dropping it killing many people is
looked at as being a horrible act against humanity. However, as bad as
it was for all of those people to suffer in the end more people would
have suffered if the war and Hitler would have continued. Nuclear
Weapons have the tendency to scare people at the same time as
protecting them (Purver 29).
The cold war was a scary time for all creating a constant fear of
obliteration. The fact that at anytime a bomb could be dropped and kill
everybody regardless of age, gender, sex, or race around for miles was
an unknown fear. It was a new concept to many of something not
discriminating. In the eyes of a nuclear weapon everybody was equal.
For that whole time everybody was terrified of the cold war, the
national government was developing highly technical security systems
for our protection. If they had not been in development there would
have been a lot more to worry about. With all the development the
balance of world power shifted and the countries with the weapons
gained more power and the countries without weapons became weaker. All
the people scared for their lives realized that only a few people in
the world held the fate of the world in their hand. All it would take
is one miscommunication between a couple of world leaders and then
world would go up in flames as fast as you could say dead. A big fear
is that a situation could occur where there is an accidental launch and
a world leader calls another to say, “sorry you are about to be hit
with a nuclear bomb” (Sheilds 16). Questions like these went through
the minds of many people who realized that just a few mistakes could
take down the entire world. It was a very unlikely situation but still
a prevalent thought. It would be better to have the fear of that phone
call to our country than to never get the call. This might sound weird
but if we were to get the call, the call would show a sign of respect
and realization that we were in a position to fight back.
Some problems that have come up are the constant threats of
terrorist bombing and hurting many people to make a statement. The
Oklahoma City Bombing is still on the minds of many people because of
the devastation of the tragic event and the fact that it happened in
the American Homeland so it could happen anywhere. At first everybody
thought that this horrible thing must have been done by someone from
the Middle East. Then when the nation found out that it was done by one
of our own the situation became more alarming. The other terrorism
attack which people remember is the World Trade Center bombing. The
friction that exists between many countries makes for a constant threat
of such attacks. “When terrorist attacks take place on United States
soil it brings the real threat of nuclear weapons to the forefront”
(Schwartz 5). The attacks that occur on other soil by the United States
makes the threat of another world struggle very prevalent. “If another
country did half of the things the United States does on foreign soil
there would be an outcry from the United States and would not go
unpunished” (Vogele 68). The United States takes it upon themselves to
be the world police. If the United States were to have problems and
another country came over to solve our problems for us, we would fight
back with furious force.
Now most of the world has come to an agreement on the amount of
production and the way the nuclear weapons should be used and when they
should be used. Now there is going to be a great deal of attention
given to the few countries not in compliance with the rest of the
world. “The United States has to stay competitive with the world on
nuclear weapon production in order to be safe and sure we can protect
ourselves as well as others” (Cowen-Karp 120). It is important to be
careful with the type of power exercised that comes with having nuclear
weapons. If this power is placed in the wrong hands the world could
cease to exist. “The few ruling powers have the unusual power to
destruct and hold together the world” (Schwartz 6).
The building of nuclear weapons is a very delicate subject for
people who see it only as being a machine of death. The building of
these lifesavers is more of a safety net then a way to kill people.
Think of our country as a tightrope walker having extreme confidence in
his skills. He knows he can make it across, but when it is a matter of
his life at stake it helps to have the safety net even though it is not
necessary. We all as a society have to realize that if used nuclear
weapons are dangerous but it is more dangerous to not have the option
of using them. Coming from a community that relies on the building of
nuclear weapons, among other things, I realize I have a bias on this
topic. However, even if I did not have this bias I still would like to
know that when it came down to it we would have enough influence that a
foreign country would think twice before sending a nuclear weapon
towards the United States.
منبع: http://www.123helpme.com
برچسبها:
سلاح های هسته ای,
Nuclear Weapons
+ نوشته شده در دوشنبه پنجم تیر ۱۳۹۱ساعت 15:28 توسط مجید.میرزایی
|
